Based on my research across multiple sources, here are the key details about Adafruit's demand letter from Fenwick: ## **Key Facts About the Demand Letter** **Timing & Sender:** - Adafruit received the letter at **10:38 p.m. ET on May 22, 2026** - Sent by **Jonathan F. Lenzner**, former FBI chief of staff and partner at **Fenwick & West LLP** - Letter was sent on behalf of **Defy Gravity, Inc. Flux. AI ("Flux")** **Demands Made:** - Adafruit must **refrain from publishing an article** about Flux - The letter characterizes the article as containing **"false and potentially defamatory claims"** about Flux - Specifically mentions concerns about statements regarding Flux's **intellectual property, business progress, and user base** **Adafruit's Response:** - Adafruit **denies the allegations** - Claims they only accessed information that was **publicly visible due to server configuration errors** - Characterizes their reporting as concerning **"public security interest"** and **"responsible disclosure"** - Has temporarily **paused blog publication** pending legal review ## **Context & Community Reaction** **Flux AI Background:** - Recently raised **$37 million** in new funding ($27M Series B led by 8VC) - Flux is described as an **AI PCB authoring product** (not to be confused with Black Forest Labs Flux image synthesis models) **Community Sentiment:** - Hacker News discussion shows **mixed reactions** - some users defend Adafruit's right to report, while others criticize Flux's product quality - Multiple users report **poor experiences** with Flux.ai, describing it as "grinding tokens for little return" ## **What's Missing** The specific content of the article Adafruit planned to publish and the exact claims Flux disputes remain unclear from available sources. The original Adafruit blog post is protected by Cloudflare and cannot be accessed directly.